Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg
Leopold Ludwig | ||||||
Chor und Orchester der Staatlichen Philharmonie Hamburg | ||||||
Date/Location
Recording Type
|
Hans Sachs | Giorgio Tozzi |
Veit Pogner | Ernst Wiemann |
Kunz Vogelgesang | Willy Hartmann |
Konrad Nachtigall | William Workman |
Sixtus Beckmesser | Toni Blankenheim |
Fritz Kothner | Hans-Otto Kloose |
Balthasar Zorn | Kurt Marschner |
Ulrich Eißlinger | Wilfried Plate |
Augustin Moser | Jürgen Förster |
Hermann Ortel | Franz Grundheber |
Hans Schwartz | Carl Schultz |
Hans Foltz | Karl Otto |
Walther von Stolzing | Richard Cassilly |
David | Gerhard Unger |
Eva | Arlene Saunders |
Magdalene | Ursula Boese |
Ein Nachtwächter | Vladimir Ruzdak |
Stage director | Leopold Lindthberg |
Set designer | Herbert Kirchhoff |
TV director | Joachim Hess |
During Rolf Liebermann’s time as general manager of the Hamburg State Opera he commissioned thirteen opera films for TV, directed for the medium by Joachim Hess but based on existing productions in the house. These films are now being made available on DVD, to my knowledge for the first time. Being made 35 to 40 years ago there are of course technical limitations as compared to latter-day productions: the sound is mono and roughly no better than LP recordings of the 1950s. Fast camera movements can sometimes blur the picture. This is a small price to pay for performances that are not only historical documents of a by-gone era but valuable for the high standard of direction, playing, acting and singing at one of the more important opera houses in Europe. I have already lavished praise on two Mozart operas, Die Zauberflöte and Le nozze di Figaro and this Meistersinger is even better. Indeed I have never felt so engaged in a performance of this opera either live or through AV media.
Sets and costumes are highly realistic and we feel transported back to16th century Nuremberg. In the first act we are in St. Katherine’s Church. In the second we can imbibe the fragrance from the lilac outside Hans Sachs’ house. In the third every nook and cranny of Sachs’ workshop seems permeated with pitch and wax. The festival meadow in the final scene is more abstract: the empty stage, shining white, is crowded with festively-dressed people in multifarious colours. Now and then we get an overview of the different settings but mostly the cameras are very active participants in the action, often on the move, scanning the congregation in the opening church scene and zooming in on interesting faces, registering every movement, gesture or facial expression throughout the performance, diving into the crowd in the last scene and, during Hans Sachs’ long Wahn-monologue, making the viewer an attentive conversation partner. One nods approvingly when Sachs sings Überall Wahn (Delusion everywhere) and shakes one’s head at Wer gibt den Namen an? (Who can put a name to it?). It is indeed a gripping performance, bringing forth laughter as well as tears. We never miss a detail of Beckmesser’s antics, especially in the scene in Sachs’ workshop, and the close-up of Eva’s cock-eyed grimace, when Beckmesser is making a fool of himself at the song contest, is priceless. The only blunder, to my mind at least, is Kothner’s roll-call of the masters in the first act, where I would have wished a distinct picture of each of them; as it is they just flash by. Later during the performance we get good opportunities to see their individually chiselled characters but the question remains: Who is who?
Whoever they are each and every one of the masters are excellent actors, which matters even more in a performance on TV with so much close-up shooting than during a stage performance. Among the masters we find some fairly well-known singers: Willy Hartmann for instance, William Workman, who was a wonderful Papageno on the Zauberflöte DVD, and a young Franz Grundheber as Hermann Ortel.
When we move over to the main characters we note an expressive portrait of Fritz Kothner by longstanding Hamburg favourite Hans-Otto Kloose. According to the booklet Kloose was a member of the ensemble for thirty years, clocking up nearly 1,800 appearances in over one hundred roles. Another mainstay in Hamburg, the impressively black-voiced bass Ernst Wiemann, was also a new name to me but he had an intense international career, including almost a decade at the New York Met. Gerhard Unger must be counted as one of the most important character tenors during the post-war era and David was one of his specialities. He sang the role at Bayreuth in 1951 for Karajan, the recording available on Naxos. He sang it again for Kempe in 1958 and also for Kubelik in 1968. Here, at 54, he still looks and sings as youthfully as ever and there seems to be not a trace of routine in his acting. His Magdalene is the pretty and lively Ursula Boese who sings with a roundness of tone few singers have mustered in this role. Endearingly pretty and sweet-looking is Arlene Saunders as Eva and her crystal clear and warm voice combined with her looks makes her ideal for the role. Her singing of the opening solo in the quintet Selig wie die Sonne (DVD2 tr. 15) is indeed divine. But she can also pucker up her brow and adopt a harsher tone when she is displeased. Richard Cassilly’s Walther is more ordinary. He is not a very convincing actor, rather wooden and gawky with a limited supply of gestures and expressions. His singing is solid but without much warmth. In the second act, outside Pogner’s house he delivers some truly heroic singing however, worthy a Tristan, a role he later successfully sang also at the Met. More through his superb acting than through his singing, Toni Blankenheim makes a memorable Beckmesser. He is a lively and expressive actor with a perfectly timed body language. He specialized in modern opera and there exists a fine recording of Alban Berg’s Lulu from 1968, recorded in Hamburg with Leopold Ludwig conducting, Anneliese Rothenberger, a surprisingly successful Lulu, Blankenheim as Doctor Schön and Gerhard Unger as his son Alva. It is of course the unfinished version but I believe it would still be attractive if EMI were to reissue it. There is also a Wozzeck DVD from Hamburg coming up.
Giorgio Tozzi, who sang at the Met for 25 years, is best known, at least to the record-buying public, for his many memorable Italian roles but he was also a fine Boris Godunov and on records he was an imposing Daland in Der fliegende Holländer for Antal Dorati (Decca). He makes a deeply humane, warm-hearted Hans Sachs, caring, loving but also authoritative and stern. He delivers his long and demanding role with untiring security and wonderful dark tone. Once or twice one can discern some strain on the uppermost notes but apart from this his is one of the most complete and rounded portraits of the Nuremberg cobbler I have come across, second only to Paul Schöffler on the old Knappertsbusch recording.
Contributing to the overall success of this production is the playing of the Hamburg Philharmonic State Orchestra under the experienced Leopold Ludwig. Although not one of the “star” conductors he had deep insights into Wagner’s music. Just listening to the act III prelude makes clear what a fine musician he is. Despite the fairly primitive sound we can appreciate Wagner’s masterly orchestration, where every strand is clearly audible and Ludwig makes the music breathe. The cello section’s opening is beautifully played and the cameras take us on a guided tour also through the pit. The chorus is excellent and there is a great deal of individual acting from the chorus members. The finale of act II with Beckmesser’s unsuccessful serenade is just as breakneck chaotic as one could wish.
I can’t imagine living with only one version of Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg, but when in the future I want to bask in the humour, warmth and humanity of Wagner’s brightest creation, this is probably the version I will return to most often.
Göran Forsling
In many ways as conventional as the contemporary studio films of Freischütz and Zar und Zimmermann (reviewed below), this setting of Wagner’s comedy benefits from the hand of experienced theatre director Leopold Lindtberg. The arguments of the Masters around Walther’s “new” song in Act 1, and the progress towards the nocturnal “cudgeling scene” at the climax of Act 2 are laid out with unusual clarity. The Act 3 “festival meadow” though, money obviously being short, is a cramped mess with only cunning camera angles to suggest the presence of a large crowd on the Wieland Wagner-like wooden rostra. This economy extends itself to the music too, with a nasty cut jumping us straight from the middle of the dances to the peoples’ acclamation of Sachs.
By the standards of Rolf Liebermann’s Hamburg the cast is only so-so. Giorgio Tozzi is a splendid Sachs, younger (hence more attractive to Eva) than usual, with a real sense of fun and an effortless grasp of both text and tessitura. His colleagues are pure of voice but rather dull – the relationship between this Eva and Walther is cosy from the word go. Blankenheim acts the hapless town clerk with credible understatement but sounds, at this recording date, pushed by any high-lying phrases. No one, Tozzi apart, seizes the comic opportunities their stage director has given them. As elsewhere in this film series, Ludwig and his orchestra (in full view during the Act 1 and 3 preludes) provide efficient rather than thrilling support. Sound and visual restoration are good.
Tozzi’s Sachs is collectable, and the ground production intelligent, but as a choice for home viewing this pales beside the subtleties of the Götz Friedrich/Frühbeck de Burgos staging (ArtHaus Musik, 4/01) with its pairing of Wolfgang Brendel and the late Gösta Winbergh.
Oh ! La galère…
En des temps lointains, à l’époque où l’on ne captait des productions lyriques qu’avec parcimonie, Rolf Liebermann voulut garder mémoire de treize des plus belles réussites de son « principat » hambourgeois. Légendaires (c’est un peu le dahut du petit monde de l’opéra, puisque, finalement, peu de ceux qui en parlaient les avaient vraiment vus) ces films étaient auréolés d’un nimbe qui devait beaucoup au souvenir de ce que le même Liebermann a fait, ensuite, à Paris. Un nimbe et quelques noms : Jurinac pour Wozzeck, Fischer-Dieskau pour la Flûte, Silja pour Fidelio…
Mais voilà, mauvaise pioche avec ces Maîtres. Treize productions, ça porte malheur ! On a tiré le gentil cousin de province. Celui qu’on ne sort qu’à regret en société ; celui qui porte (c’est d’ailleurs l’un des derniers) d’improbables complets pied-de-poule, des gants beurre-frais et des bottines vernies… Le brave garçon, comme on dit chez moi.
C’est très périlleux de monter les Maîtres. Parce que, plus peut-être qu’aucun autre opéra de Wagner, il prête autant aux tunnels qu’à la caricature. Le « saint art allemand » a fait beaucoup de mal à son géniteur et a servi de caution a de biens tristes sires. Carton-pâte et bannières ; barbes postiches poussiéreuses et tout le tralala. Petit examen : avons-nous droit à cela ici ? Pas tout à fait, puisque la production réussi le tour de force périlleux de faire un acrobatique grand écart entre les options contraires du « Nouveau Bayreuth » d’alors : l’épure de Wieland Wagner et l’imagier sur-décoratif et redondant de son frère Wolfgang.
Un peu court pour ce qui est de la souplesse que demande l’exercice M. Lindtberg reste fâcheusement coincé entre les deux. Décors sobres (c’est l’euphémisme pour « rudimentaires »). Rien ne déplaît franchement ; rien ne captive non plus. On aime juste la couleur passée des costumes crypto-renaissants parce que ça donne un (tout) petit frisson archéologique. C’est comme contempler une vieille tunique délavée, fripée et mitée dans un obscur musée de troisième rang ; c’est un témoignage. Comme, aussi, le play-back (plutôt bien maîtrisé, par ailleurs).
Le I défile ; le II ne dérange pas (même s’il est cruellement mal éclairé) ; la Saint-Jean indiffère, avec sa troupe bariolée sur fond blanc-sale. Elle indiffère comme tout le reste en fait, qui n’impose rien, ne raconte guère, ne s’envole jamais… ne décolle même pas. Des Maîtres qui ne carburent à rien : ni au diesel, ni au schnaps, ni même au gros rouge qui tache. Des Maîtres tristes, sans rebond ni mot. Des Maîtres qui font passer ceux du pire Bayreuth pour une réussite d’une franche spiritualité.
Ah ! La vilaine soupe. Voilà, je l’ai dit, même si j’étais finalement plutôt bien disposé en posant ces amères galettes dans mon lecteur. D’ailleurs pourquoi continuer à parler de Maîtres ici ? C’est absolument tout sauf magistral ! Ecoutez l’appel de cuivres ridicule (pas même fanfaronnant) qui suit le quintette du III ! Ecoutez cela et rien d’autre en fait. Parce que personne ne le mérite vraiment dans ce contexte. Ni Tozzi qui récite quelque chose qui ressemble fort à l’annuaire de Munich ; ni Blankenheim qui fait un Beckmesser piteux, pathétique, crapaud infâme qui croasse dans un marais fangeux ; ni toute la troupe qui les entoure; ni Cassilly qui s’engorge sur la moindre tenue et n’instille qu’une poésie extrêmement minimale à ce rôle qui, bien compris, est l’un des plus lumineux du répertoire wagnérien ; ni, enfin, Arlene Saunders, fifille (vieille fifille) gentiment popote.
Un mot pour Leopold Ludwig : solide. Et un grand coup de chapeau au David si bien chantant, si frais et fine-mouche de Gerhard Unger. Un apprenti quadragénaire, je sais ; mais qu’il domine bien son sujet. Dommage qu’on le trouve déjà (et tellement mieux entouré) chez Kubelik et Kempe !
Pour les compulsifs.
Benoît BERGER